US20110302827A1 - Inhibiting Stress Corrosion Cracking of Metal Exposed to Moderate to High Concentrations of Ethanol - Google Patents
Inhibiting Stress Corrosion Cracking of Metal Exposed to Moderate to High Concentrations of Ethanol Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110302827A1 US20110302827A1 US13/160,776 US201113160776A US2011302827A1 US 20110302827 A1 US20110302827 A1 US 20110302827A1 US 201113160776 A US201113160776 A US 201113160776A US 2011302827 A1 US2011302827 A1 US 2011302827A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- ethanol
- acid
- blend
- fuel
- corrosion inhibitor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F11/00—Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
- C23F11/08—Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids
- C23F11/10—Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids using organic inhibitors
- C23F11/12—Oxygen-containing compounds
- C23F11/124—Carboxylic acids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L1/00—Liquid carbonaceous fuels
- C10L1/10—Liquid carbonaceous fuels containing additives
- C10L1/14—Organic compounds
- C10L1/18—Organic compounds containing oxygen
- C10L1/188—Carboxylic acids; metal salts thereof
- C10L1/1881—Carboxylic acids; metal salts thereof carboxylic group attached to an aliphatic carbon atom
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L1/00—Liquid carbonaceous fuels
- C10L1/10—Liquid carbonaceous fuels containing additives
- C10L1/14—Organic compounds
- C10L1/18—Organic compounds containing oxygen
- C10L1/188—Carboxylic acids; metal salts thereof
- C10L1/1881—Carboxylic acids; metal salts thereof carboxylic group attached to an aliphatic carbon atom
- C10L1/1883—Carboxylic acids; metal salts thereof carboxylic group attached to an aliphatic carbon atom polycarboxylic acid
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L10/00—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes
- C10L10/04—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for minimising corrosion or incrustation
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the use of chemical additives to inhibit corrosion of a metal that is exposed to moderate to high concentrations of ethanol, such as in certain blends of transportation fuel and ethanol.
- Transportation fuels such as gasoline and diesel, are liquid hydrocarbon mixtures that are used in internal combustion engines. These transportation fuels are produced from crude oil in an oil refinery and distributed to gasoline stations where they are sold to retail consumers in smaller quantities. The oil refineries are typically located where large amounts of crude oil can be easily delivered, such as near a coastline where the crude oil is delivered by large ships. However, gasoline stations that sell both gasoline and diesel are located throughout the regions where fuel is needed for operating automobiles, farm equipment, and other devices having internal combustion engines. Accordingly, gasoline and diesel fuel may be transported from an oil refinery to gasoline stations by truck. Alternatively, gasoline, for example, may be transported from an oil refinery through a pipeline to a regional distribution center before being taken to proximate gasoline stations by truck. These pipeline, as well as storage tanks and other equipment associated with the storage and transportation of gasoline, are at risk for corrosion caused by the fuels or fuel mixtures therein.
- Fuel-grade ethanol is an alternative oxygenate that is now widely used in gasoline throughout the United States and Brazil. In the U.S., ethanol is primarily produced by the fermentation of yellow corn.
- One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for inhibiting corrosion of metal exposed to a blend of fuel and ethanol.
- the method comprises adding an effective stress corrosion cracking inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol that contacts the metal, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof.
- the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof.
- Another embodiment of the present invention provides a further method for inhibiting corrosion of metal exposed to a blend of fuel and ethanol.
- the method comprises adding an effective stress corrosion cracking inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol that contacts the metal, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid having one or more functional groups selected from carboxylic acids, alkene bonds, hydroxyl groups, and combinations thereof.
- the present invention provides a method for inhibiting corrosion of metal in a pipeline containing a blend of gasoline and ethanol.
- the method comprises adding an effective corrosion inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into a blend of gasoline and ethanol flowing through a pipeline, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof.
- the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof.
- the present invention may be used with any ethanol concentration, but the corrosion inhibitors are effective where the ethanol concentration in the blend of fuel and ethanol is greater than ten percent, greater than fifteen percent, greater than twenty-five percent, or even greater than 95 percent.
- the corrosion inhibitors are effective for inhibiting stress corrosion cracking of metal exposed to high concentrations of ethanol, such as in the fuel mixture known as E85 containing up to 85% ethanol and gasoline.
- the selected organic acid is ammoniated.
- the organic acid may be mixed with ammonium hydroxide in substantially stoichiometric amounts such that the organic acid is present as the ammonium salt of the organic acid.
- the corrosion inhibitor is added into the blend of fuel and ethanol in an amount providing between 10 and 1000 ppm of the corrosion inhibitor based on the ethanol content of the blend. More specifically, the corrosion inhibitor may be added into the blend in an amount providing between 100 and 600 ppm of the corrosion inhibitor based on the ethanol content of the blend.
- the corrosion inhibitors are equally effective regardless of whether they are added before or after the blending of the ethanol and fuel.
- the corrosion inhibitor is optionally added as a solution including a solvent selected from water, methanol, and combinations thereof.
- a solvent selected from water, methanol, and combinations thereof.
- the solvent delivery system used with the corrosion inhibitor is not believed to play any role in the performance of the corrosion inhibitor in inhibiting stress corrosion cracking, but should not interfere with the ultimate use of the fuel blend.
- the method includes flowing the blend of fuel and ethanol through a pipeline including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol. Accordingly, the corrosion inhibitor is added into the flowing blend of fuel and ethanol at a plurality of injection points spaced apart along the length of a pipeline. Adding the corrosion inhibitor in this manner preferably enables a sufficient concentration of the corrosion inhibitor throughout the length of the pipeline.
- the method may include storing the blend of fuel and ethanol in a storage tank including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol.
- the foregoing corrosion inhibitors are used in combination with one or more other corrosion inhibitors. It is believed that the corrosion inhibitors of the present invention are effective for inhibiting ethanol-induced stress corrosion cracking, whereas conventional corrosion inhibitors may also be used to inhibit corrosion caused by other components flowing in the pipe and/or corrosion of other types or mechanisms. For example, 500 ppm citric acid may be added into the blend of ethanol and fuel to inhibit stress corrosion cracking, while one or more conventional corrosion inhibitors may also be added into the blend of ethanol and gasoline to inhibit general corrosion or pitting.
- a conventional corrosion inhibitor may include a sulfur-containing functional group (such as a mercapto or thiol) or a quaternary amine functional group.
- the conventional corrosion inhibitor may be an imidazoline corrosion inhibitor.
- the conventional corrosion inhibitor may be selected from dimer acids, trimer acids, derivatives of succinic anhydride, and combinations thereof.
- the conventional corrosion inhibitors may be used in one of the foregoing methods further comprising the step of adding an effective general corrosion inhibiting amount of a conventional corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol.
- SSR slow strain rate
- crack growth tests were performed on base metal specimens machined from one X-60 line pipe steel to illustrate the effectiveness of various inhibitors at preventing ethanol stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
- the testing was performed with un-notched specimens having a gage length of 25 mm (1 inch) and a gage diameter of 3.2 mm (0.125 inches).
- a displacement rate of 1 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 inches/sec was used, which produced a strain rate of 1 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 sec ⁇ 1 .
- the SSR tests were performed in stainless steel test cells with a total volume of 400 mL, where the volume was filled with 350 mL of solution leaving a vapor space of 50 mL.
- the tests were performed using a simulated fuel grade ethanol (SFGE) containing 5 ppm chloride (Cl).
- SFGE simulated fuel grade ethanol
- Cl chloride
- the specimens were tested under freely corroding conditions and the corrosion potential was monitored in each test using an Ag/AgCl/EtOH reference electrode. Based on independent measurements of chloride leakage rate from the reference electrode, it was estimated that the chloride concentration in the test cell increased by about 1 ppm during the course of the SSR tests.
- a piece of rusted pipe steel was placed in the test cell and galvanically connected to the test specimen to more closely simulate the native corrosion potential of a mill scaled/rusted pipe wall. The rusted steel to specimen area ratio was approximately 5 to 1.
- the specimen and rusted steel piece were electrically isolated from the specimen grips and test cell in the SSR test machine.
- test solutions were performed at room temperature and the cell was actively sparged with breathing air at a flow rate of approximately 4 mL/minute. Ethanol bubbler traps were used on the inlet and outlet to the test cell to remove/exclude any moisture. Post-test analysis was not performed on the test solutions, but extensive previous water analyses of test solutions from the SSR tests indicated that there was negligible pick-up of water in the tests.
- Table 1 summarizes the results of the SSR tests.
- the first column in the table identifies the conditions to which the specimen was exposed, including air, FGE, SFGE and various inhibitors.
- the second column in the table is the total time to failure in the SSR test, in hours.
- the third column in the table is the reduction in area of the cross section of the specimen, in percent. In general, less reduction in area occurs in the smooth tensile specimens that exhibit cracking.
- the fourth column in the table is the maximum stress sustained by the specimen, the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), which is the maximum load divided by the initial cross sectional area.
- UTS ultimate tensile strength
- the fifth column in Table 1 is the time-to-failure ratio, which is the time to failure for each test divided by the average time to failure for the duplicate air tests of specimens of the same material.
- the sixth column in the table is the reduction in area ratio (for un-notched specimens), which is the reduction in area for each test specimen divided by the average reduction in area for the air tests.
- the seventh column in the table is the UTS ratio, which is the UTS for each test specimen divided by the average UTS for the air tests.
- the eighth column in Table 1 is the crack depth, in micrometers, measured on the fracture surface in the SEM. The depth of the second deepest thumbnail crack on the fracture surface of each specimen is recorded, since in some cases the deepest crack was not representative of the other cracks found on the fracture surface.
- the ninth column in the table is the pseudo-crack growth rate, in mm/s, calculated by dividing the crack depth by the time to failure. No change (“-”) in columns eight and nine indicates that no cracking was found in the specimen.
- the time to failure, reduction in area, UTS, ratios of these parameters to the air tests, crack depth, and crack growth rate all provide indications of the severity of SCC that occurred in the specimen.
- the time to failure ratio, reduction in area ratio, and UTS ratios are preferable to the underlying parameters since they more easily indicate cracking severity. The smaller the value of the ratio relative to one, the more severe the cracking.
- the tenth column in Table 1 is the average corrosion potential. In each test, corrosion potential readings were recorded every minute using a data acquisition system. The potential data for each test were averaged and the results are shown in Column 10.
- results of the baseline test performed in the SFGE show that the time to failure ratio and reduction in area ratio were all less than the values in the air tests and relatively deep stress corrosion cracks were present on the fracture surface.
- the results of the baseline test performed in one lot of actual FGE was very similar to the results of the baseline test performed in the SFGE (fifth row). This indicated that the extent of SCC in this specimen exposed to FGE was very similar to that observed in the specimen exposed SFGE, thereby validating the use of SFGE for most of the inhibitor work.
Abstract
An effective stress corrosion cracking (SCC) inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor is added into a blend of fuel and ethanol that contacts a metal, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof. For example, the corrosion inhibitors inhibit stress corrosion cracking of pipeline grade metal pipe at ethanol concentrations greater than fifteen percent. In one embodiment, the corrosion inhibitor is added into a blend of fuel and ethanol flowing through a pipeline at a plurality of injection points spaced apart along the length of the pipeline. In one option, the corrosion inhibitor is ammoniated to form the ammonium salt of the organic acid. In another option, the foregoing corrosion inhibitors are used in combination with one or more conventional corrosion inhibitors in an amount that is effective to inhibit general corrosion.
Description
- This application claims priority to co-pending U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/355,028, filed on Jun. 15, 2010.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to the use of chemical additives to inhibit corrosion of a metal that is exposed to moderate to high concentrations of ethanol, such as in certain blends of transportation fuel and ethanol.
- 2. Background of the Related Art
- Transportation fuels, such as gasoline and diesel, are liquid hydrocarbon mixtures that are used in internal combustion engines. These transportation fuels are produced from crude oil in an oil refinery and distributed to gasoline stations where they are sold to retail consumers in smaller quantities. The oil refineries are typically located where large amounts of crude oil can be easily delivered, such as near a coastline where the crude oil is delivered by large ships. However, gasoline stations that sell both gasoline and diesel are located throughout the regions where fuel is needed for operating automobiles, farm equipment, and other devices having internal combustion engines. Accordingly, gasoline and diesel fuel may be transported from an oil refinery to gasoline stations by truck. Alternatively, gasoline, for example, may be transported from an oil refinery through a pipeline to a regional distribution center before being taken to proximate gasoline stations by truck. These pipeline, as well as storage tanks and other equipment associated with the storage and transportation of gasoline, are at risk for corrosion caused by the fuels or fuel mixtures therein.
- Combustion of hydrocarbons in gasoline with oxygen in air produces carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and various nitrogen oxides. Gasoline may be formulated with other components, such as methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) which raises the octane number and serves as an oxygenate to reduce the amount of carbon monoxide produced. However, MTBE has fallen out of favor as a result of being found as a pollutant in groundwater. Fuel-grade ethanol (FGE) is an alternative oxygenate that is now widely used in gasoline throughout the United States and Brazil. In the U.S., ethanol is primarily produced by the fermentation of yellow corn.
- As the use of ethanol and ethanol-gasoline blends increases, it would be desirable to transport these fluids through pipelines. Unfortunately, ethanol can cause corrosion of metal, including stress corrosion cracking (SCC). Furthermore, difficulties arise in transporting ethanol through a pipeline because ethanol has a high affinity for oxygen and water. If any water is present within the pipeline or storage facilities, then the ethanol can become unusable as a transportation fuel. In fact, the extent of the stress corrosion cracking increases with ethanol concentration and the presence of oxygen. For this reason, the ethanol content in much of the gasoline use in the United States does not exceed ten percent (10%).
- Though these corrosion issues might be avoided using exotic metallurgies or polymer lined pipe, the investment necessary to build new pipelines with the necessary materials is prohibitively expensive. Rather, it would be desirable to use the existing infrastructure of pipelines, or even new pipelines made with standard pipeline-grade steel, to handle ethanol or ethanol/gasoline blends. Still further, it would be beneficial to enable pipelines to handle ethanol at concentrations greater than ten percent. Presently used transport fuel corrosion inhibitors, often referred to as “rust” inhibitors, as qualified using the procedure written in NACE Standard TM0172, have not been demonstrated to be effective at stopping stress corrosion cracking caused by ethanol in pure ethanol or in ethanol blends. The chemistries used for these rust inhibitors are known as: dimer acids, trimer acids, or blends of dimer and trimer acids; and derivatives of succinic anhydride.
- One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for inhibiting corrosion of metal exposed to a blend of fuel and ethanol. The method comprises adding an effective stress corrosion cracking inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol that contacts the metal, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof.
- Another embodiment of the present invention provides a further method for inhibiting corrosion of metal exposed to a blend of fuel and ethanol. The method comprises adding an effective stress corrosion cracking inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol that contacts the metal, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid having one or more functional groups selected from carboxylic acids, alkene bonds, hydroxyl groups, and combinations thereof.
- The present invention provides a method for inhibiting corrosion of metal in a pipeline containing a blend of gasoline and ethanol. The method comprises adding an effective corrosion inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into a blend of gasoline and ethanol flowing through a pipeline, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof.
- The present invention may be used with any ethanol concentration, but the corrosion inhibitors are effective where the ethanol concentration in the blend of fuel and ethanol is greater than ten percent, greater than fifteen percent, greater than twenty-five percent, or even greater than 95 percent. For example, the corrosion inhibitors are effective for inhibiting stress corrosion cracking of metal exposed to high concentrations of ethanol, such as in the fuel mixture known as E85 containing up to 85% ethanol and gasoline.
- In one embodiment, the selected organic acid is ammoniated. For example, the organic acid may be mixed with ammonium hydroxide in substantially stoichiometric amounts such that the organic acid is present as the ammonium salt of the organic acid.
- In another embodiment, the corrosion inhibitor is added into the blend of fuel and ethanol in an amount providing between 10 and 1000 ppm of the corrosion inhibitor based on the ethanol content of the blend. More specifically, the corrosion inhibitor may be added into the blend in an amount providing between 100 and 600 ppm of the corrosion inhibitor based on the ethanol content of the blend. However, it is believed that the corrosion inhibitors are equally effective regardless of whether they are added before or after the blending of the ethanol and fuel.
- In a further embodiment, the corrosion inhibitor is optionally added as a solution including a solvent selected from water, methanol, and combinations thereof. The solvent delivery system used with the corrosion inhibitor is not believed to play any role in the performance of the corrosion inhibitor in inhibiting stress corrosion cracking, but should not interfere with the ultimate use of the fuel blend.
- In a still further embodiment, the method includes flowing the blend of fuel and ethanol through a pipeline including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol. Accordingly, the corrosion inhibitor is added into the flowing blend of fuel and ethanol at a plurality of injection points spaced apart along the length of a pipeline. Adding the corrosion inhibitor in this manner preferably enables a sufficient concentration of the corrosion inhibitor throughout the length of the pipeline.
- In a similar embodiment, the method may include storing the blend of fuel and ethanol in a storage tank including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol. In yet another embodiment, the foregoing corrosion inhibitors are used in combination with one or more other corrosion inhibitors. It is believed that the corrosion inhibitors of the present invention are effective for inhibiting ethanol-induced stress corrosion cracking, whereas conventional corrosion inhibitors may also be used to inhibit corrosion caused by other components flowing in the pipe and/or corrosion of other types or mechanisms. For example, 500 ppm citric acid may be added into the blend of ethanol and fuel to inhibit stress corrosion cracking, while one or more conventional corrosion inhibitors may also be added into the blend of ethanol and gasoline to inhibit general corrosion or pitting. For example, a conventional corrosion inhibitor may include a sulfur-containing functional group (such as a mercapto or thiol) or a quaternary amine functional group. Alternatively, the conventional corrosion inhibitor may be an imidazoline corrosion inhibitor. Still further, the conventional corrosion inhibitor may be selected from dimer acids, trimer acids, derivatives of succinic anhydride, and combinations thereof. The conventional corrosion inhibitors may be used in one of the foregoing methods further comprising the step of adding an effective general corrosion inhibiting amount of a conventional corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol.
- Both slow strain rate (SSR) and crack growth tests were performed on base metal specimens machined from one X-60 line pipe steel to illustrate the effectiveness of various inhibitors at preventing ethanol stress corrosion cracking (SCC). The testing was performed with un-notched specimens having a gage length of 25 mm (1 inch) and a gage diameter of 3.2 mm (0.125 inches). A displacement rate of 1×10−6 inches/sec was used, which produced a strain rate of 1×10−6 sec−1. The SSR tests were performed in stainless steel test cells with a total volume of 400 mL, where the volume was filled with 350 mL of solution leaving a vapor space of 50 mL.
- The tests were performed using a simulated fuel grade ethanol (SFGE) containing 5 ppm chloride (Cl). The specimens were tested under freely corroding conditions and the corrosion potential was monitored in each test using an Ag/AgCl/EtOH reference electrode. Based on independent measurements of chloride leakage rate from the reference electrode, it was estimated that the chloride concentration in the test cell increased by about 1 ppm during the course of the SSR tests. A piece of rusted pipe steel was placed in the test cell and galvanically connected to the test specimen to more closely simulate the native corrosion potential of a mill scaled/rusted pipe wall. The rusted steel to specimen area ratio was approximately 5 to 1. The specimen and rusted steel piece were electrically isolated from the specimen grips and test cell in the SSR test machine. The tests were performed at room temperature and the cell was actively sparged with breathing air at a flow rate of approximately 4 mL/minute. Ethanol bubbler traps were used on the inlet and outlet to the test cell to remove/exclude any moisture. Post-test analysis was not performed on the test solutions, but extensive previous water analyses of test solutions from the SSR tests indicated that there was negligible pick-up of water in the tests.
- After testing, the specimens were examined and optically photographed. The fracture surfaces were examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the depths of the stress corrosion cracks on the fracture surfaces were measured. The depth of the second deepest crack in each specimen was recorded. Other parameters that were recorded for each test included the time to failure, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and reduction in area (un-notched specimens only).
- Table 1 summarizes the results of the SSR tests. The first column in the table identifies the conditions to which the specimen was exposed, including air, FGE, SFGE and various inhibitors. The second column in the table is the total time to failure in the SSR test, in hours. The third column in the table is the reduction in area of the cross section of the specimen, in percent. In general, less reduction in area occurs in the smooth tensile specimens that exhibit cracking. The fourth column in the table is the maximum stress sustained by the specimen, the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), which is the maximum load divided by the initial cross sectional area.
- The fifth column in Table 1 is the time-to-failure ratio, which is the time to failure for each test divided by the average time to failure for the duplicate air tests of specimens of the same material. The sixth column in the table is the reduction in area ratio (for un-notched specimens), which is the reduction in area for each test specimen divided by the average reduction in area for the air tests. The seventh column in the table is the UTS ratio, which is the UTS for each test specimen divided by the average UTS for the air tests.
- The eighth column in Table 1 is the crack depth, in micrometers, measured on the fracture surface in the SEM. The depth of the second deepest thumbnail crack on the fracture surface of each specimen is recorded, since in some cases the deepest crack was not representative of the other cracks found on the fracture surface. The ninth column in the table is the pseudo-crack growth rate, in mm/s, calculated by dividing the crack depth by the time to failure. No change (“-”) in columns eight and nine indicates that no cracking was found in the specimen.
- The time to failure, reduction in area, UTS, ratios of these parameters to the air tests, crack depth, and crack growth rate all provide indications of the severity of SCC that occurred in the specimen. In general, the time to failure ratio, reduction in area ratio, and UTS ratios are preferable to the underlying parameters since they more easily indicate cracking severity. The smaller the value of the ratio relative to one, the more severe the cracking.
- The tenth column in Table 1 is the average corrosion potential. In each test, corrosion potential readings were recorded every minute using a data acquisition system. The potential data for each test were averaged and the results are shown in Column 10.
- The data from the control tests of line pipe steel in air (the first and second rows of the table) were used to calculate the mechanical property ratios for the SSR tests performed in the cracking environments.
- The results of the baseline test performed in the SFGE (fifth row) show that the time to failure ratio and reduction in area ratio were all less than the values in the air tests and relatively deep stress corrosion cracks were present on the fracture surface. The results of the baseline test performed in one lot of actual FGE (fourth row) was very similar to the results of the baseline test performed in the SFGE (fifth row). This indicated that the extent of SCC in this specimen exposed to FGE was very similar to that observed in the specimen exposed SFGE, thereby validating the use of SFGE for most of the inhibitor work.
- The same tests were repeated on identical specimens using a citric acid inhibitor formulation, glucose in methanol/water inhibitor formulation, ammoniated L-ascorbic acid in water inhibitor formulation, and L-ascorbic acid in water inhibitor formulation. No SCC was observed with two of the inhibitors (citric acid and ammoniated L-ascorbic acid), but there was some pitting on the gage section of the specimen tested in citric acid. Minor SCC was observed with L-ascorbic acid, while the glucose inhibitor was the only inhibitor in which significant SCC was observed. Based on these results, citric acid performed very well and the pitting associated with citric acid may be eliminated with the use of a conventional corrosion inhibitor. L-ascorbic acid alone was approximately 80% effective and with the addition of ammonia it was nearly 100% effective to inhibit SCC in line pipe steel exposed to FGE.
- The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and/or groups, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. The terms “preferably,” “preferred,” “prefer,” “optionally,” “may,” and similar terms are used to indicate that an item, condition or step being referred to is an optional (not required) feature of the invention.
- The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or steps plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but it is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Claims (23)
1. A method for inhibiting corrosion of metal exposed to a blend of fuel and ethanol, comprising:
adding an effective stress corrosion cracking inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol that contacts the metal, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid selected from citric acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, maleic acid, oxaloacetic acid, oxalosuccinic acid, ketoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, malic acid, aconitic acid, fumaric acid, isomers of these organic acids, and a combination thereof.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fuel is selected from gasoline and diesel.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor is added into the blend of fuel and ethanol in an amount providing between 10 and 1000 ppm of the corrosion inhibitor based on the ethanol content of the blend.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor is added into the blend of fuel and ethanol in an amount providing between 100 and 600 ppm of the corrosion inhibitor based on the ethanol content of the blend.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor is added as a solution including a solvent selected from water, methanol, and combinations thereof.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ethanol concentration in the blend of fuel and ethanol is greater than fifteen percent.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ethanol concentration in the blend of fuel and ethanol is greater than twenty-five percent.
8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
flowing the blend of fuel and ethanol through a pipeline including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor is added into the flowing blend of fuel and ethanol at a plurality of injection points spaced apart along the length of the pipeline.
10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
storing the blend of fuel and ethanol in a storage tank including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor includes citric acid.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor includes ascorbic acid.
13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor is ammoniated to form the ammonium salt of the organic acid.
14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
adding an effective general corrosion inhibiting amount of a conventional corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol.
15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the conventional corrosion inhibitor is selected from dimer acids, trimer acids, derivatives of succinic anhydride, and combinations thereof.
16. A method for inhibiting corrosion of metal exposed to a blend of fuel and ethanol, comprising:
adding an effective stress corrosion cracking inhibiting amount of a corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol that contacts the metal, wherein the corrosion inhibitor is an organic acid having one or more functional groups selected from carboxylic acids, alkene bonds, hydroxyl groups, and combinations thereof.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the ethanol concentration in the blend of fuel and ethanol is greater than fifteen percent.
18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor is ammoniated to form the ammonium salt of the organic acid.
19. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:
flowing the blend of fuel and ethanol through a pipeline including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol.
20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the corrosion inhibitor is added into the flowing blend of gasoline and ethanol at a plurality of injection points spaced apart along the length of the pipeline.
21. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:
storing the blend of fuel and ethanol in a storage tank including metal exposed to the blend of fuel and ethanol.
22. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:
adding an effective general corrosion inhibiting amount of a convention corrosion inhibitor into the blend of fuel and ethanol.
23. The method of claim 22 , wherein the conventional corrosion inhibitor is selected from dimer acids, trimer acids, derivatives of succinic anhydride, and combinations thereof.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/160,776 US20110302827A1 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-06-15 | Inhibiting Stress Corrosion Cracking of Metal Exposed to Moderate to High Concentrations of Ethanol |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US35502810P | 2010-06-15 | 2010-06-15 | |
US13/160,776 US20110302827A1 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-06-15 | Inhibiting Stress Corrosion Cracking of Metal Exposed to Moderate to High Concentrations of Ethanol |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110302827A1 true US20110302827A1 (en) | 2011-12-15 |
Family
ID=44483983
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/160,776 Abandoned US20110302827A1 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-06-15 | Inhibiting Stress Corrosion Cracking of Metal Exposed to Moderate to High Concentrations of Ethanol |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20110302827A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011159764A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9732430B2 (en) | 2013-10-24 | 2017-08-15 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Chemical inhibition of pitting corrosion in methanolic solutions containing an organic halide |
GB2616938A (en) * | 2022-01-04 | 2023-09-27 | Innospec Ltd | Corrosion inhibitor |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
MD4245C1 (en) * | 2012-04-19 | 2014-02-28 | Институт Химии Академии Наук Молдовы | Inhibitor of steel corrosion in water |
MD4310C1 (en) * | 2013-07-17 | 2015-06-30 | Институт Химии Академии Наук Молдовы | Inhibitor of steel corrosion in water |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2712572A (en) * | 1947-03-27 | 1955-07-05 | Int Electronics Co | Superimposed plural recording |
US4242099A (en) * | 1979-02-09 | 1980-12-30 | Ethyl Corporation | Fuel additive for diesel fuels |
US4282007A (en) * | 1980-09-22 | 1981-08-04 | Texaco Inc. | Novel fuel composition containing alcohol |
US4426208A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1984-01-17 | Ethyl Corporation | Corrosion inhibitors for alcohol-based fuels |
US4440545A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1984-04-03 | Ethyl Corporation | Gasohol having corrosion inhibiting properties |
US4521219A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1985-06-04 | Ethyl Corporation | Alcohol based fuels containing corrosion inhibitors |
US5356546A (en) * | 1992-04-16 | 1994-10-18 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Metal salts useful as additives for fuels and lubricants |
US5365546A (en) * | 1990-01-18 | 1994-11-15 | Norand Corporation | Method of and apparatus for controlling modulation of digital signals in frequency-modulated transmissions |
US20050028435A1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2005-02-10 | Stuart Pace | Low nitrogen content fuel with improved lubricity |
US20070113467A1 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2007-05-24 | Novus International Inc. | Biodiesel fuel compositions having increased oxidative stability |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2715572A (en) * | 1951-09-13 | 1955-08-16 | Karl F Hager | Camphoric acid salts as inhibitors for water soluble fuels |
US4508540A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1985-04-02 | Ethyl Corporation | Alcohol based fuels |
AU756277B2 (en) * | 1997-12-12 | 2003-01-09 | Capital Strategies Global Fund L.P. | Constant heating value aqueous fuel mixture and method for formulating the same |
EP1967567A3 (en) * | 2007-02-22 | 2008-10-08 | Afton Chemical Corporation | Methods and compositions for reducing deposits in engines combusting alcohol-containing fuels |
US20080216393A1 (en) * | 2007-03-08 | 2008-09-11 | Dumont Richard J | Methods and compositions for reducing corrosion and increasing engine durability in engines combusting alcohol-containing fuels |
KR101722272B1 (en) * | 2008-10-10 | 2017-03-31 | 더루우브리졸코오포레이션 | Additives to reduce metal pick-up in fuels |
-
2011
- 2011-06-15 US US13/160,776 patent/US20110302827A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-06-15 WO PCT/US2011/040452 patent/WO2011159764A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2712572A (en) * | 1947-03-27 | 1955-07-05 | Int Electronics Co | Superimposed plural recording |
US4242099A (en) * | 1979-02-09 | 1980-12-30 | Ethyl Corporation | Fuel additive for diesel fuels |
US4282007A (en) * | 1980-09-22 | 1981-08-04 | Texaco Inc. | Novel fuel composition containing alcohol |
US4426208A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1984-01-17 | Ethyl Corporation | Corrosion inhibitors for alcohol-based fuels |
US4440545A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1984-04-03 | Ethyl Corporation | Gasohol having corrosion inhibiting properties |
US4521219A (en) * | 1981-11-02 | 1985-06-04 | Ethyl Corporation | Alcohol based fuels containing corrosion inhibitors |
US5365546A (en) * | 1990-01-18 | 1994-11-15 | Norand Corporation | Method of and apparatus for controlling modulation of digital signals in frequency-modulated transmissions |
US5356546A (en) * | 1992-04-16 | 1994-10-18 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Metal salts useful as additives for fuels and lubricants |
US20050028435A1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2005-02-10 | Stuart Pace | Low nitrogen content fuel with improved lubricity |
US20070113467A1 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2007-05-24 | Novus International Inc. | Biodiesel fuel compositions having increased oxidative stability |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9732430B2 (en) | 2013-10-24 | 2017-08-15 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Chemical inhibition of pitting corrosion in methanolic solutions containing an organic halide |
US10392712B2 (en) | 2013-10-24 | 2019-08-27 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Chemical inhibition of pitting corrosion in methanolic solutions containing an organic halide |
GB2616938A (en) * | 2022-01-04 | 2023-09-27 | Innospec Ltd | Corrosion inhibitor |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2011159764A1 (en) | 2011-12-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sridhar et al. | Stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in ethanol | |
Sowards et al. | Corrosion of copper and steel alloys in a simulated underground storage-tank sump environment containing acid-producing bacteria | |
CA2741837C (en) | Amino and imino propionic acids, process of preparation and use | |
US20110302827A1 (en) | Inhibiting Stress Corrosion Cracking of Metal Exposed to Moderate to High Concentrations of Ethanol | |
JPS6119693A (en) | Anticorrosive for liquid fuel | |
Voice et al. | Lubricity of Light-End Fuels with Commercial Diesel Lubricity Additives | |
Yeşilyurt et al. | Biodiesel induced corrosion and degradation | |
Berlanga-Labari et al. | Compatibility study of high density polyethylene with bioethanol–gasoline blends | |
Pedraza-Basulto et al. | Effect of water on the stress corrosion cracking behavior of API 5L-X52 steel in E95 blend | |
Beavers et al. | Prevention of internal SCC in ethanol pipelines | |
Maldonado et al. | SCC of carbon steel in fuel ethanol service: effect of corrosion potential and ethanol processing source | |
Gui et al. | Conducting electrochemical measurements in fuel-grade ethanol using microelectrodes | |
Galante-Fox et al. | E-85 fuel corrosivity: effects on port fuel injector durability performance | |
Rawat et al. | Effect of ethanol–gasoline blends on corrosion rate in the presence of different materials of construction used for transportation, storage and fuel tanks | |
Joseph | Structural Integrity of Materials in Fuel Ethanol Environments | |
Beavers et al. | Effects of steel microstructure and ethanol-gasoline blend ratio on SCC of ethanol pipelines | |
Chapman et al. | Effects of gasoline and ethanol fuel corrosion inhibitors on powertrain intake valve deposits | |
Meenakshi et al. | Effect of flow and dissolved oxygen on the compatibility of Pongamia pinnata biodiesel with common construction materials used in storage and transportation | |
Kane | Use of NACE TM0111 slow strain rate test for evaluation of ethanol SCC | |
Joseph et al. | Effect of Chloride in The Electrochemical Degradation of Carbon Steel in E40 Fuel Ethanol Applications | |
Wang et al. | Research on the influence of fuel detergent synergist on engine fuel supply system | |
Gui et al. | Evaluation of Ammonia Hydroxide for Mitigating Stress Corrosion Cracking of Carbon Steel in Fuel Grade Ethanol | |
Goodman et al. | Investigation of passivation characteristics of X65 pipeline steel in Ethanol Fuel Environments | |
Hernández et al. | Corrosion rate of API 5l-X52 steel for the biofuels transportation | |
Viveros et al. | The Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility in Ethanol-Gasoline Blends |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CHAMPION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JACKSON, TRACEY;STRONG, RUSSELL;REEL/FRAME:026452/0043 Effective date: 20110613 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |